Public AI Summit for Educators
Join us on September 16-17 for keynotes and interactive workshops designed to help educators navigate AI with confidence.Learning Objectives
- Develop and apply critical thinking and ethical reasoning skills through reflection
- Evaluate the potential impact of AI-generated content on the trust and integrity of teacher-student relationships
Instructions
Context: You are applying for a job, graduate school, or other important program for which you need to submit a letter of recommendation. Your favorite teacher has agreed to write a letter on your behalf and submits one that is AI-generated without your knowledge or consent.
- Prompt an LLM tool of your choice to write a letter of recommendation for you. Assume that your teacher submitted this letter of recommendation on your behalf.
- To the extent that you feel comfortable, you may customize the prompt to reflect your skills and experiences. You may also create a persona and/or use fake information; otherwise use brackets to anonymize the letter. Do not include any personally identifiable information about yourself in the prompt. For instance, you might use language such as the following: “Write a letter of recommendation for [top student] applying to a graduate program at [top university] and include the following points and examples [xyz]. Refer to the student in the letter as [top student] and to the school as [top university].”
- Feel free to re-prompt to refine the letter and get it close to your liking. Do not further customize/edit the LLM output you choose.
- Include both the prompt(s) and the LLM’s response(s) in your assignment submission.
- Write a 300-500 word reflection that considers some of the following questions:
- Do you like the AI-generated letter? Do you believe it accurately represents your abilities? Do you think you would be considered a strong candidate for the job or program you’re applying to based on this letter?
- How would you feel if this letter (or one similar to it) was submitted on your behalf? Is it ethical for a recommender to submit an AI-generated letter? What about one that was partially written with AI, but then further edited?
- Consider whether your stance might change depending upon the extent and degree of AI use. For example, would it be acceptable or ethical if the teacher used a text generator for certain parts of the letter, such as developing a first draft based on AI-generated bullet points, improving the letter’s structure, or making the vocabulary sound more refined?
- Do you think learning about your teacher using an AI tool to fully (or partially) write your letter would affect your opinion of them? How?
- Do the same expectations apply to teachers that apply to students? Is it worse, better, or the same if a teacher uses AI tools without disclosing?
- How might a student’s use of AI without permission or disclosure impact the trust and sense of community among teachers and students?
- Bonus question: Is there something that we didn’t ask that came to mind for you? Write (and then answer!) your own reflection question.